Hubungan Pengalaman Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Metode Mengajar Khusus dengan Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Elektro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/jeve.v2i2.84Kata Kunci:
learning experience; Special Teaching Methods; teaching practicum; electrical engineering education; correlationAbstrak
This study aimed to examine the relationship between the learning experience in the Special Teaching Methods (Metode Mengajar Khusus, MMK) course and the success of the Teaching Practicum (Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan, PLK) among Electrical Engineering Education students at Universitas Negeri Padang, in terms of the direction, strength, and significance of the relationship. This quantitative correlational study involved 48 students from the 2022 cohort, selected through total (saturated) sampling. The MMK learning experience was measured using a 25-item Likert-scale questionnaire covering five dimensions (teaching simulation, lesson planning, classroom management, use of media and technology, and reflection and feedback), which was valid and reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.974). PLK success was obtained from the students' final PLK scores. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk test, a linearity test, Pearson product-moment correlation, a t-test, and the coefficient of determination. The MMK learning experience was in the high category (mean = 94.10), and all PLK scores were in the very high category (mean = 90.73; range = 79.55–98.88). There was a positive and significant relationship between the two variables (r = 0.583, moderate; calculated t = 4.861 > critical t = 2.013; Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). The coefficient of determination of 0.339 indicates that 33.9% of the variance in PLK scores was associated with the MMK learning experience, while the remaining 66.1% was associated with other factors. Students with a better MMK learning experience tended to obtain higher PLK scores. These findings highlight the need to strengthen microteaching practice and lecturer feedback in the MMK course.
Referensi
[1] Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
[2] Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 53 Tahun 2023 tentang Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi.
[3] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[4] Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
[5] Putra, A., & Ahyanuardi, A. (2022). Pengaruh metoda mengajar khusus, praktik lapangan kependidikan dan efikasi diri terhadap kesiapan menjadi guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(2), 218–225.
[6] Täschner, J., Dicke, T., Reinhold, S., & Holzberger, D. ([tahun]). “Yes, I can!” A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies promoting teacher self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, volume, [halaman]. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231221499
[7] Saputri, D. A., Murtinugraha, R. E., & Arthur, R. (2023). Kontribusi respon mahasiswa pada pembelajaran micro dan capaian pembelajaran (CP) micro terhadap capaian pembelajaran (CP) praktik kependidikan di PTSP FT UNY. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 3(2), 169–198.
[8] Sibiani, N. I., Hariyanto, V. L., & Yudianto, A. (2024). The contribution of microteaching achievements and teaching readiness to teaching practicum achievements in the civil engineering and planning education study program, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 1–10.
[9] Marnoko, & Rahayu, S. (2024). Pengaruh microteaching terhadap kemampuan mengajar mahasiswa pada saat Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan (PLK). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 453–462.
[10] Astuti, M., Kanada, R., Suryana, I., Miranti, M., Andini, A., Jannah, M., & Sadina, B. (2024). Microteaching sebagai pusat sumber belajar di era digital. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(3), 2430–2437.
[11] Pfitzner-Eden, F. (2016). Why do I feel more confident? Bandura’s sources predict preservice teachers’ latent changes in teacher self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1486.
[12] Hardianti, E., & Listiadi, A. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik, kompetensi profesional terhadap kinerja pengenalan lapangan persekolahan mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 9(1), 95–103.
[13] Pusat Program Pengalaman Lapangan. (2022). Pedoman Praktek Lapangan Kependidikan. LP3M Universitas Negeri Padang.
[14] Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-3). Bandung: Alfabeta.
[15] Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[16] Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–61.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Journal of Electrical Vocational Education
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which means all papers can be downloaded, shared, and reused without restriction, as long as the original authors are properly cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
In exceptional circumstances, articles may be licensed differently. If you have a specific condition (such as one linked to funding) that does not allow this license, please mention this to the editorial office of the journal at submission.
